Difference Between Coach And A Manager In Football : Let’s be fair. How many times have you abused your manager after your team failed in a game? Or else, how many times have you accused the administration of your team for not getting enough quality performers for the team? But in reality, how much of the guilt does the manager actually consider himself for that failure? What does the head coach actually do, and how is he any separate from a manager? Why is a head coach, whose title has grown sort of a trend doesn’t actually stand up?
A Manager is a part of a football team who has total power over the performing and functioning of the team. He has the independence to choose his helping staff, along with the provision to add performers to the team if he deems it essential.
And, a Head coach is only given the charge of ensuring his team putting a good display in the match they are playing. That includes the likes of selecting the first team and training the players in particular sets of routines required for their place in the team. The administration of the team is under their respective club board.
The manager is the one in charge, and he makes sure the team gets the consequences. Sir Alex Ferguson is the best sample of a manager you can find – Sir Alex Ferguson made sure he got the players he required for the team and had the complete right over his first-team choice, along with a choice few of his supporting team who worked to help him during training.
A manager is not just included on the pitch. His kingdom extends over the complete club at times, including improving the player’s nightlife, as we have oh so often observed. This amount of liberty which is given to the role is the specific reason why not every individual who stands up as a manager is filled for the job. It is often mistaken that a classic legend of a player will certainly follow his beautiful football with the team he selects to manage because he knows his way nearby the ball. Yes, his intellectual understanding of the game might give him a good over those who have not, but that does not convert his player-handling abilities or make him a leader. Andre Villas-Boas, who had had the chance of managing Chelsea before moving from Spurs had accomplished a treble in the very first season he succeeded Porto. He had no playing profession with the ball, and yet he was one of the very few to manage this feat. A manager’s main role is to secure victory for the club board, for which causes he is given free responsibility. These include administration, strategical knowledge, and Public Relations among many others.
A head coach is like a teen studying. All though he is fully responsible for everything he does in school, his parents manage what he does outdoor of it. A head coach is only given the ability to ensure his team placing a good performance in the match they are performing. That involves the likes of selecting the first team and training the players in particular sets of routines required for their spot in the team. The administration of the team is under the club board, and any player who enters or departs the team does so on their mission and not the coach. It’s like working on the beach with huge ankle weights.
Tottenham Manager Pochettino, in his discussion over a year ago quite exactly put what the distinction is in the two roles. He said-
A piece of advice he gives to the manager and the head coach – “IF YOU’RE THE MANAGER, YOU DECIDE EVERYTHINGS ABOUT THE CLUB BOARD. BUT IF YOU’RE A HEAD COACH, YOUR DUTY IS TO PLAY BETTER, TRY TO DEVELOP THE PLAYERS PERFORMANCE AND TO GET POSITIVE RESULTS.”
Experience while being a manager and head coach – “AT SOUTHAMPTON, BUT I WAS A MANAGER. MY RESPONSIBILITY WAS NOT ONLY TO TRAIN THE TEAM. WITH TOTTENHAM, I WAS ALSO THE HEAD COACH. A HEAD COACH IS THE HEAD OF YOUR DEPARTMENT. MY DEPARTMENT IS TO GUIDE THE TEAM.”
Perversely, the positions often go overlooked by the fans. As understood from above, Pochettino is the head coach. Tony Pulis and Gus Poyet were the head coaches back at West Brom and Sunderland sequentially. Guus Hiddink of the Chelsea although an interim manager, performs more like the head coach, due to the administration’s sway over the club board.
While a head coach is technically measured down the job of a manager, he is often assumed to achieve the same outcomes. With the confusion from fans even, a head coach often gets himself in the deeply bothered waters due to the continuous pressure of results and the lack of independence to make adequate changes in the team. The new trend of being a head coach is more problem than not. They often turn around to accuse their own management of not giving them the wanted funds for the players, in order to try to woo the assistance of the fans to stop them from being inevitably sacked. Di Canio, Rene Meulensteen, Alan Irvine, Villas-Boas are just a some of the names who were fired after being the head coach for their respective clubs.
While the method of a head coach might work well in some leagues in Europe like the Bundesliga, it is so because of the management giving adequate space for the coaches to do their work well. For smaller clubs, the role of a manager and a head coach do not actually differ much as the manager does not have much to attend after separation from his team. Alongside, their conditions are given pressure and are considered by the management more thoughtfully than being excluded. The team’s conditions also play an important role in the selection of a head coach beyond a manager. Head coaches manage to be more technically sound and are made in to improve the playing characteristics of the team. This system will not operate in England because of the repeated headbutting of the management of the club in the manager and head-coaches affairs and every single club holding a high profile. Apart from that, being thick-skinned and being capable to react to the English media without trying to damage the club’s name is difficult when you cannot put the blame on the management.