BCCI Emerges as Top Earner Despite PCB’s Protest in ICC Revenue Share Approval


The Board of Control for Cricket in India (BCCI) has reclaimed its position as the highest-earning cricket body in the world. The International Cricket Council (ICC) recently approved the revenue share model, allocating 38.4% of the total revenue generated to the BCCI. Despite the protest by the Pakistan Cricket Board (PCB) during the ICC meeting in Durban, the decision remained unchanged. This article delves into the details of the ICC revenue share model, the BCCI’s dominance, and the implications for cricket globally.

Also read: BCCI introduces new rules and regulations following 19th Apex Council meeting

The ICC Revenue Share Model

During the ICC meeting in Durban, the revenue share model was officially approved, determining the distribution of funds among cricket boards. The BCCI emerged as the primary beneficiary, with a share of $230 million out of a total revenue pool of $600 million for the next four years. This substantial allocation of 38.4% reinforces the BCCI’s financial dominance within the cricketing world. Other cricket boards, such as the England and Wales Cricket Board (ECB), Cricket Australia, and the Pakistan Cricket Board, received relatively smaller shares, with 6.89%, 6.25%, and 5.75% respectively.

BCCI’s Dominance and PCB’s Protest

The BCCI’s position as the top earning cricket body is a testament to its massive contribution to cricket revenues. The board’s financial strength is primarily due to the popularity and commercial success of the Indian Premier League (IPL), which has established itself as one of the most lucrative cricket tournaments globally. The BCCI’s ability to generate substantial revenue has consistently placed it in a commanding position, enabling it to influence decision-making processes within the ICC.

The PCB’s protest against the revenue share allocation reflects the ongoing imbalance of power within international cricket. While the PCB argued against the model, it was unable to sway the decision in its favor. The BCCI’s financial clout, coupled with its significant contribution to cricket revenue, made it difficult for other boards to challenge its position. This situation raises questions about the equitable distribution of resources and the need for a more balanced revenue-sharing model.

Implications for Cricket’s Global Landscape

The approval of the revenue share model reaffirms the financial disparity between cricket boards. While the BCCI’s dominant position strengthens its resources and influence, it also raises concerns about the sustainability and inclusivity of the global cricketing ecosystem. The ICC’s commitment to enhanced funding for all member boards, along with the establishment of a strategic investment fund, aims to drive global growth initiatives in line with its Global Growth Strategy. These measures intend to address the disparities and promote the development of cricket in emerging nations.

However, it is essential for cricket’s governing bodies to ensure that the distribution of resources reflects the sport’s global reach. By fostering a more equitable revenue-sharing model, cricket can provide opportunities for growth, infrastructure development, and talent nurturing in regions beyond the traditional powerhouses. This approach will not only enhance the competitiveness of the sport but also broaden its appeal and foster its expansion into untapped markets.

With the approval of the revenue share model, the BCCI has once again solidified its status as the top earning cricket body globally. Despite the protest by the PCB, the allocation of 38.4% of the total revenue to the BCCI remains unchanged. While the financial dominance of the BCCI is a testament to its contributions, there is a pressing need to address the existing disparities and create a more balanced revenue-sharing model. By promoting inclusivity and equitable distribution of resources, cricket can thrive as a global sport, ensuring the growth and development of the game worldwide.